FANDOM

DantheDVDMan

Administrator
  • My occupation is administrator on Nickipedia
  • I am Dan
A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
  • Hey! I left you a message over on Discord, but I am happy to confirm nickelodeonshows.fandom.com has now been closed and that URL redirected to this wiki.

    Likewise with iCarly, there is now just one unified iCarly Wiki at w:c:icarly and one iCarly Fanon Wiki at w:c:icarlyfanon. A good result for everyone! :)

      Loading editor
  • I asked Snoopy The Dog this question and he told me to ask the other admins about it. Do you agree?

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Listen, I added the Diaspro images and gifs on her page. Please unprotected the Diaspro page!

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hi there! I replied to your message on Discord. :)

      Loading editor
  • Hello Dan,

    Just a general question to gather input: would it be better for this wiki to rename articles that are episode lists to a new naming scheme?

    Currently, the scheme for these articles are like this:

    E.g. SpongeBob SquarePants episode list.

    I was thinking this may be a better naming scheme:

    E.g. List of SpongeBob SquarePants episodes


    Your thoughts?

      Loading editor
    • I agree, changing to that naming scheme would help standardize our list pages here (character lists use that scheme but not episode lists). As far as I know, your suggested format is also what Wikipedia and most other wikis prefer.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • So recently I was looking though the comments on some of these articles, some people said they didn’t like the show (or character, or episode), and other people disrespected there opinion. I went Though and deleted some of those comments (Most Where rude comments), would like to here what you think about this issue.

      Loading editor
    • I agree. We shouldn't allow that kind of negativity/disrespect against others' opinions.

      Some wikis have a specific comment policy. I think we might need to make a new policy page at Nickipedia:Comment rules. Borrowing some of Steven Universe Wiki's guidelines, our rules could be:

      • Users can comment respectful opinions about an article's subject.
        • Any negative/disrespectful comments about a different user's opinion will be removed.
      • The comment should be of some relation to the content found within the page.
        • Pointless comments such as "First", "Second", or what could be seen as randomly inserted characters will be removed.
      • Keep comments of a reasonable length.
        Loading editor
    • This reply has been removed
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Is Rugrats Pre-School Daze was not a Nicktoon when it's a 2008 miniseries?

      Loading editor
    • According to the sources from before it premiered, it was only intended as a miniseries of specials based on Rugrats, not a full show. With that in mind, it doesn't exactly belong in a list of the (full-series) Nicktoons that Nick has made. It's still an official Nicktoon spin-off project (like how the Astrology with Squidward short series is still a Nicktoon project), but it isn't one of the full-fledged Nicktoons.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I just wanted to say thank you so much for saving me from a certain user who has been flaming on the message wall while I was on hiatus

    I have received notifications and I am not happy because of these...

    But nevertheless, I give you thanks

      Loading editor
    • No problem, that user has been trolling a lot of users (including me) on sockpuppet accounts. I try to ignore his posts and block him ASAP.

        Loading editor
    • Good to know!

      But there's also a way to report his butt

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I Think We Should probably only put Images of Toys on The List of Nickelodeon Toys Page, and Not The Characters Galleries I know it's The Character and The character has Merchandise but we don’t need those there, Anyway Just Saying Like to hear what you Think about this.

      Loading editor
    • I mostly agree. I think that adding a lot of merchandise images to characters' galleries can add unnecessary clutter. Some galleries are already pretty cluttered anyway.

      I can also see when merchandise pictures would be helpful to a character gallery, to illustrate a trivia point or otherwise. For example, all of the SpongeBob plush toys change his holes to be yellow instead of green. Readers would find it helpful to see a picture of the plush with yellow holes on the article for SpongeBob.

      I guess one or two images of merchandise (on a character article) are fine, to show readers how the character looks in toy form. But any more than that is just cluttering up a gallery, and they should only belong on the list page.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hey I was wondering if you could look at nickipedia.fandom.com and merge the Wikis and have the URL redirects to this Wiki because this Wiki is more active and complete than nickipedia.fandom.com and this Wiki is the official Nick Wiki

      Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.